Collin Funk wrote: > I'm still finishing some things before we can recommend it for > testing.
Right. It would not be productive if we had different package maintainers report the same bug(s) at the same time. > But Wget seems like a good project for testing. Do you have > any thoughts Bruno? Among the packages listed in users.txt, I can imagine that the following — whose maintainers have occasionally shown up on this mailing list — would respond to beta-testing requests in a friendly manner: autobuild https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/gitweb/?p=autobuild.git;a=tree bison https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=bison.git;a=tree clisp https://gitlab.com/gnu-clisp/clisp coreutils https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=tree diffutils https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=diffutils.git;a=tree emacs https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=emacs.git;a=tree findutils https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=findutils.git;a=tree gettext https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gettext.git;a=tree gnutls https://www.gnutls.org/ https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls.git gsasl https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gsasl.git;a=tree grep https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=grep.git;a=tree gzip https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gzip.git;a=tree libffcall https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libffcall.git;a=tree libiconv https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libiconv.git;a=tree libidn https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libidn.git;a=tree libidn2 https://gitlab.com/libidn/libidn2 libntlm https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/gitweb/?p=libntlm.git;a=tree libunistring https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=libunistring.git;a=tree libvirt https://libvirt.org/ https://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=tree m4 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=m4.git;a=tree pspp https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=pspp.git;a=tree wget https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=wget.git;a=tree wget2 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=wget/wget2.git;a=tree Bruno
