Paul Eggert <[email protected]> writes: > On 2025-09-11 03:53, Bruno Haible wrote: >> IMO, not wasting memory should be priority #1 here, before simplicity >> or multithread-safety. ('cvs' is not a multithreaded program.) > > Hmm, well, if CVS is the only user and we have a fix that satisfies a > CVS maintainer, perhaps we can simply agree to disagree about this > particular simplicity-vs-performance tradeoff.
I don't think CVS has had a commit in over a decade, so I would not expect that to change. I can't check since all of gnu.org is down... Collin
