Hi Paul, On 2026-02-14T10:50:42-0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 2026-02-14 10:07, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > On 2026-02-14T09:43:47-0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > > > It's OK for a reproducible function's body to contain a > > > call to a function not marked reproducible, so long as the call is never > > > executed.... > > > This can happen when, for example, there's a debugging flag set at > > > compile-time, and the flag is off so the compiler can easily determine the > > > call cannot happen. > > > > If you mean code that is stripped out by the preprocessor, it wouldn't > > be a problem. > No, I mean code that survives the preprocessor, but evaluates to 'false' at > compile time. This is a common idiom, and it's often better than using the > preprocessor.
Is this soved by alx-0087r5? Or could you show an example to analyze? Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
