Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list <[email protected]> writes: > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT-0 */ ... > +/*** > + Copyright © 2026 The systemd Project > + > + Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a > copy > + of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to > deal > + in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the > rights > + to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell > + copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is > + furnished to do so. > + > + THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR > + IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, > + FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE > + AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER > + LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING > FROM, > + OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN > THE > + SOFTWARE. ... > +License: > +LGPLv2+ > + > +Maintainer: > +all
What is gnulib's policy on non-FSF and/or non-(L)GPL licensed modules? I thought that we required FSF copyright assignment for contributions, and that there were a preference for (L)GPL licenses. Did we ever write that down somewher, or is there no consensus on that? /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
