Hi Paul, > Date: 2026-08-01 18:29:13-0500 > From: Paul Eggert <[email protected]> > > On 8/1/26 17:10, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > #include's aren't that important. > > But this whole thread is about #includes, no? > > I would focus energy on areas of the manual where effort provides the most > bang for the buck. As your remark suggests, this particular area is low > priority.
I wouldn't call it low priority or low bang for the buck. What I mean is that it's not a breaking change. I believe education is important, and provides bang for the buck. It's not all about features. The features are already there, but misused. Have a lovely night! Alex > Also, given what I've seen in the thread so far, the proposed > change could even yield a negative return overall. -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
