* Andreas K. Huettel: > Am Donnerstag, 6. August 2026, 04:57:44 Chinesische Normalzeit schrieb > Florian Weimer: >> * Bruno Haible: >> >> > Hi Adhemerval, >> > >> > Thank you for working on this. >> > >> >> it breaks our previous policy of not adding retroactively symbols. >> >> And therefore this breaks versioned dependencies in most RPM-based >> distributions. > > Not being familiar with RPM packaging, would that also be the case if we > release > a 2.44.1 version from the 2.44 branch immediately after backporting that > commit?
That would result in version set dependencies on GLIBC_2.44.1, and RPM would work correctly.
