On Wed, July 1, 2009 16:13, Jacinta Richardson wrote: > I imagine that the author didn't intend that effect of calling the > subroutine that way.
Absolutely right. > I suspect it's a matter of laziness. I claim ignorance. I didn't know there was a fundamental difference between the two ways of calling a subroutine. Thanks for the explanation. > I'd suggest applying the patch with this tidied up as > appropriate. I agree. Cheers, Richard (learning all the time) _______________________________________________ Bug-gnupod mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupod
