> I don't understand the relationships of namespaces to nodes though. Why > should a namespace be associated with a particular node? > Could we say that all namespaces must belong to a document rather than a > node?
A namespace appears in a document in the form of a node, which declares a new namespace. For example, <overlay xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> </overlay> 'overlay' is a normal node. The xmlns declarations declare that tags like <html:p> are valid in the node content, and should be validated/processed in a different way. In other words, all children of that <overlay> node can be made to be in that namespace. As soon as the <overlay> tag is closed, the namespace is no longer visible, and you can't any longer put any <html:xxx> tags. Unless you declare the namespace again ... but you can use a different prefix and/or url ... so it's really a new different namespace! What libxml2 does is, when it finds the opening <overlay> node declaring the namespace, it creates a namespace struct describing the namespace. All nodes have a list of namespaces they belong to. In this case, all subnodes of <overlay> might belong to the namespace html declared in <overlay>. The namespace struct is owned by the node which declares it (the fact that subnodes of this node belong to this namespace does not affect the memory management of the namespace - ie, they don't retain it ... which might be considered a memory bug in libxml2 even if it rarely - if ever - will show up). When the <overlay> node is freed, all the namespaces it declares are freed. I need to think more about how to redesign the API so that it works. Let me know if you have suggestions. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
