On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 09:57:18 +0300
Sir Raorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I've found bug in gnustep-make ;-)

I ran into two problems last night, though it's not really a bug, more
like a missing feature (or maybe I'm just overlooking something?):

/path/to/GNUstep/System/Makefiles/rules.make should define MAKE and
point either to make(1) or gmake(1) - depending on which you need to
use (eg. gmake(1) on BSD).
The reason is that, for example clean and distclean on Pantomime bails
out, as those are defined as

        after-clean::
                cd charsets ; make clean
                cd Testing ; make clean

        after-distclean::
                cd charsets ; make distclean
                cd Testing ; make distclean

in Pantomime/GNUmakefile.postamble. Should use ${MAKE} instead.

The gnustep-make package should also define -D<system> somewhere, to
make system dependent #include/import a bit easier.
(eg, Linux seems to define AF_INET in <netdb.h> while on BSD it's in <sys/socket.h> 
...)

-- 
Chris

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep

Reply via email to