Begin forwarded message:
> From: Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon Apr 08, 2002 03:43:42 PM Europe/London
> To: Serg Stoyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: patch to gnustep-base (Unicode and others)
>
>
> On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 10:13 AM, Serg Stoyan wrote:
>> RFM> OK ... guess I was wrong about that ... it *does* seem to say
>> strings
>> RFM> should be converted to unicode ... but that's
>> incorrect/misleading
>> RFM> documentation.
>>
>> What documentation do you reccomend me to use? Apple's FoundationKit
>> and AppKit frameworks documentation? It says the same. What else?
>> Maybe i misunderstand you at some point?
>
> I don't think so ... I'm just saying that the wording in the
> documentation on
> this point is poor ... and is misleading/wrong. That doesn't mean to
> imply
> that there is another better set of documentation anywhere.
> When you read the documentation in depth, and look at what the various
> implementations actually do, you can tell what they intended to say.
>
>> RFM> Thanks, I've added them (I converted to ascii with \u escapes for
>> RFM> consistency with the other files, but that should make no
>> difference).
>>
>> By the way, you probably forgot to upload these files to CVS.
>
> Yes, sorry, they are definately comitted now.
>
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
