> GSTextStorage is almost an exact copy of > GSMutableAttributedString/GSAttributedString. > > I think it would be easier if we just used behaviors to add that > functionality to GSTextStorage. The only problem is that GSTextStorage > uses an extra call in some routines: > > - (void) edited: (unsigned)mask range: (NSRange)old changeInLength: > (int)delta; > > > But perhaps we could just put a dummy implementation of that in > GSMutableAttributedString. Does this sound ok?
I wish I could say yes :-) but it would bind gnustep-gui to special gnustep-only features of gnustep-base ... which does not look like a feasible option. Still, I'm definitely annoyed - as you are - by having the code for an entire class duplicated literally in two different classes in two different libraries. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
