Nicola Pero wrote: >>>>$(MAKE) doc=yes tries to run autogsdoc, which is not found on a system >>>>without an installed gnustep-base. >>> >>>Why is that a problem? >>> >>>In what cases would it occur? >> >>building a binary package with an autobuilder, I cannot assume that >>autogsdoc is already installed on the system (building the Debian >>packages ...). > > > We could/should distribute the pregenerated html doc separately anyway - I > think we already do, so you can just install it without needing to > generate it. > > Btw, maybe autogsdoc should be a separate package from gnustep-base. > It's a complete, separate software package on its own. >
Yes. The way it's set up now, it doesn't even work right - the generated docs don't go in the right place (and they don't get installed either). So I do it manually now. Perhaps after this release I'll concentrate more on getting the documentation organized. -- Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp. | I'm glad I hate spinach, because http://www.doc.com | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you | know how I hate the stuff. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
