Hi Jeff, > Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > > On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 12:48 pm, Jeff Teunissen wrote: > > > Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > > >> On Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 10:30 am, Serg Stoyan wrote: > > >>> Hi Adam, > > [snip] > > > >>>> I didn't apply this patch, mostly because I kind of like the > > >solid>>> background, although I could be convined otherwise. Does > > >anyone>>> else have a preference? > > >>> > > >>> Tastes differ... I like OPENSTEP look of NSScroller. > > >> > > >> I think we should stick to policy of having a NeXTstep look ... > > >and> use NSInterfaceStyle where people want alternatives. So a > > >patch to> support an interface style which gives a stippled > > >scroller background> ought to be admissable IMO. > > > > > > The NeXTstep look _is_ stippled. :) > > > > I'll take your word for it ... I no longer have a NeXTstep system > > since the hardware I used for it died. It didn't *look* stippled to > > me as far as I can remember, but I had a lower quality display back > > then and it could just have looked like a solid grey because of > > that. > > On my (24bpp, so it's not a color depth thing) OPENSTEP 4.2/Intel > machine, the scroller well is filled with a checkerboard pattern > composed of single pixels that alternate between 1/3 and 2/3 intensity > (AKA darkGrayColor and lightGrayColor), starting with 2/3 intensity at > the top left, with a lightGrayColor 1-pixel interior border. > > It's not a thoroughly big deal, but that's the way it's drawn. :) > > It looks like the attached shot (selection captured with Grab and > scaled up by a factor of six).
This is what my patch does. -- Serg Stoyan _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
