David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > I don't have an app complex enough to test regressions (and the > guile-gdl2 regression testing tool I'm working out now was ironically > the executable bitten) but I believe it to be sane to assume that before > an EODatabaseChannelNeededNotfication is posted, that EODatabseChannel > should have recieved an +initialize and before an > EOCooperatingObjectStoreNeeded is posted, than EODatabaseContext should > have been initialized.
Why the EODatabaseChannel should have received the +initialize before the notification of the EOObjectStoreCoordinator ? You should invoke it manually, it has no sense. > If not, then we might in insure all expected > initializes have been sent in some startup function that we somehow > guarantee to be called early in GDL2 initialization. I don't know of a different function than +load to do the job. Remember that I can only use EOControl without EOAccess (ok, maybe not now), why do I have to force the developer to call +initialize method of these classes ? > Here's a patch to move the +load implementations to +initialize. Not applied. -- Ciao Mirko _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
