Hello Alexander, AM> > Take a look at following pictures please:
[snip] AM> > On the pictures 1 and 3 bottom of the text is lower bottom side of AM> > textfield. Isn't it a reason of exceptions? I'll look at code AM> > probably tommorow. AM> AM> I don't think this has anything to do with the problems. The current AM> typesetter places the gap between the "line height" and real "text AM> height" above the text, which is probably what's causing the text to AM> appear further down. (In other words, the text touches the lower AM> edge of the line height rectangle.) I'll change this so the gap is AM> below the text instead. (So the text touches the upper edge of the AM> line height rectangle.) Ok, I see. I thought it's related... If no, anyway it's annoying behaviuor. [snip] AM> I should have been clearer. It isn't the point size of the text AM> that's too high, it's the line height. Anyway, I could add some AM> magic when placing the baseline when the container is too small to AM> fit anything, but I'd prefer not to. I think moving the text up (in AM> it's line height) will take care of this in all sane cases. :) But line height depends on glyph height, doesn't it? -- Serg Stoyan _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
