I can confirm that the code now runs o.k. Thanks again, Stefan On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 14:36, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 12:27 PM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > > > > > On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 11:58 AM, Stefan B�hringer wrote: > > > >> I'm using the following: > >> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mffinder]$ gcc3 -v > >> Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.1/specs > >> Configured with: ../gcc-3.2.1/configure --prefix=/usr > >> --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,f77 --enable-shared > >> --enable-threads=posix > >> --enable-nls --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --without-included-gettext > >> --with-system-zlib --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs > >> --program-suffix=3 > >> Thread model: posix > >> gcc version 3.2.1 > > > > I'm using 3.4 ... but I wouldn't call 3.2 old. > > I have an old (slow) machine with 3.0 on it, so I'm going to update it > > to the current GNUstep code from cvs, and try building and running > > your zillion test there. > > Ok ... I had to hack the zillion code around a bit to get it to compile > with gcc-3.0 (that compiler doesn't support forward declaration of > protocols), but when I ran the resulting code it crashed. Looks like > this is the old compiler bug of Protocol objects not being properly > initialized by the compiler/runtime. I had thought that this was fixed > by gcc-3.2 but it looks like that is not the case :-( Probably you > need 3.3 or later. > > I think it is possible to code an (ugly) hack to work around the > problem into the NSDistantObjects code. I may do that after lunch.
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
