Re: [Patch/base](HEAD) GSObjCSuper

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:08:56 -0700

Adam Fedor wrote:


On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 03:28 AM, David Ayers wrote:

       * Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h (GSObjCSuper):
       Added test for uninitialized superclass reference.

Commited to HEAD.
(And will commit to the branch if no one objects.)

OK.

I'm not certain though, whether we want to commit the previos patch:
2003-08-24  David Ayers  <d dot ayers at inode dot at>

       * Headers/Additions/GNUstepBase/GSObjCRuntime.h
       (GSObjCClass):  Allow nil values.
       (GSObjCIsInstance): Ditto.
       (GSObjCIsClass): New function.
       (GSClassNameFromObject): Ditto.
       (GSObjCIsKindOf):  Use GSObjCSuper() in favor of
       class_get_super_class().

...

Committed to the release branch.

I think we can commit this to the branch. Especially since these are (or may be) useful for GDL2 users. I don't want base-1.8.0 to be obsolete before it's released.

Well, it's not necessarily needed by GDL2, but it's useful for people using GSObjCRuntime functions in +load, but none the less, the guile tests passed.

Anyway, I'll probably make another pre-release next week.

Thanks for the warning. I'll see if I can get some more testing of the branch done.

Cheers,
David




_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep

Reply via email to