On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 08:55, David Ayers wrote: > Adam Fedor wrote: > > >On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 03:12, David Ayers wrote: > > > >> > >>To me it seems the entire header should be either public or have it's > >>contents moved to GSCategories.h > >> > >> > > > >Yes. There doesn't seem to be any reason not to have them in > >GSCategories. No rush though - I think it could happen whenever one of > >us gets around to it. > > > > > Well to simply move the contents (w/o necesarily removing any files) is > straight forward and as 'GSCompatibility.h' is private, it should be > easy to safely replace all includes to point to 'GSCategories.h' in > -baseadd. > > My original concern is the to allow GDL2 and GSWeb to build on OS X with > the -baseadd installed. > > So if I have the OK to do it on the release branch, I can go ahead and > do that now, if you don't consider it too late. And probably also on > the trunk, while we ponder on alternatives. >
OK. Can we get Philip or someone to test it? _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
