On 2004-02-17 03:53:41 +0100 Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
See the attached patch. It contains what is missing. Basically. the code updates the _items and _levelOfItems lists. The thought was, that if in reloadItem the outline view gets another item object both data structures currently still hold references to the old one. I am actually not quite sure whether it is ok and does not break anything else, but here it seems to work so far. You better check that :-)a > part of my patch is missing, and I wonder why.
At the end of the reloadItem... method I updated _items and _levelOfItems
to > ensure that those containers reflect the possible change of the item
object. > Did you just forget this or was something wrong with that part of the
patch?
What was the change?
I did forget about that, or rather, I didn't even realize that there was more in the patch. Sorry for that. As I am currently away from home it will take some time until I am able to correct this. Perhaps somebody else will pick up this task?
I will.
Thanks. Cheers Andreas
-- Andreas Heppel
Mail: aheppel at web dot de Home: http://www.andreasheppel.de
Check out Burn.app - the CD burning frontend for GNUstep http://gsburn.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
