David Ayers wrote: > [snip] So I would be grateful if you could post your patch > again, possibly in coherent separate posts so that the issues can be > addressed individually. I know its extra work but I really think it is > needed here.
Yes, that would be nice. [snip change NSTemporaryDirectory() behavior] > I can see how one can derive this from the documentation. Not from GNUstep's documentation, which is what matters (when, for once, it exists ;-). > But IMO, this > definitely needs a transition period for code relying on the secureness > of NSTemporaryDirectory(). First we need a major release which > introduces something like a GSSecureTemporaryDirectory(), have > NSTemporaryDirectory() return that same directory and prominently > announce that NSTemporaryDirectory() won't return a secured directory > but the system directory in future releases. We can then consider > changing NSTemporaryDirectory() for the following major release. A better way of adding this new "system temporary directory" function would be to just add GSSystemTemporaryDirectory(). There's no reason to break NSTemporaryDirectory(). - Alexander Malmberg _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
