Adam, > Well, the stuff we still need is really basic - getting the correct > visual and colormap, etc. We could rewrite it, but then it would still > have to be maintained. I've thought about it, but it doesn't really > seem worth my time.
Dare I say it, but it seems that libwraster isn't exactly updated often. Why don't we just take the tiny parts of the code that we need and stick them in GNUstep itself? Are there copyright assignment issues here? _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
