This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
 of the project: GNUstep.




/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #9595] Full Item Snapshot:

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=9595>
Project: GNUstep
Submitted by: Alexander V. Diemand
On: Thu 07/08/2004 at 14:52

Category:  Libraries
Severity:  5 - Average
Item Group:  Bug
Resolution:  None
Assigned to:  None
Status:  Open


Summary:  StepTalk was not able to handle more than 256(128) literals in scripts.

Original Submission:  Scripts written in Smalltalk and interpreted by StepTalk where 
limited to max. 256 literals (1 byte index) such as strings and numbers per block. 
This is way below what is normally needed.
A simple update of the compiler which computes the literal's index and stores it in 
the bytecode, plus the interpreter was necessary to allow for 16 bit indexes. This 
should allow for 64k literals.

The attached diff is made from the following files:
StepTalk/Languages/Smalltalk/STBytecodes.m
StepTalk/Languages/Smalltalk/STCompiler.m
against the current CVS version.

BTW: the patch uploaded by Mateu has not been fully applied to the CVS version of 
StepTalk. The needed change to STCompiler.m has been included again.

Thanks for including this in CVS.

Alex.




CC List
-------

CC Address                          | Comment
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
stefanu                             | 



File Attachments
-------------------

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 07/08/2004 at 14:52  Name: bugfix_size_of_literal_index.diff  Size: 3.01KB   
By: axeld
Diff against STCompiler.m and STBytecodes.m
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?item_id=9595&amp;item_file_id=1469






For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=9595>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep

Reply via email to