All, --- David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > > On 2005-06-30 12:14:37 +0100 David Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> FWIW, remember that -raise technically can return! See the past > >> discussion about the uncaught exception handler in -gui. > > > > > > I missed that ... I think it's a bug. > > I violently agree, yet others saw this as a feature. > > > The -raise method should never return ... that's the MacOS-X behavior > > (and the MacOS-X documentation says that -raise will terminate the > > program irrespective of the behavior of the exception handler). That's not entirely accurate... > It seems they also saw the light :-) > > > I guess we need to correct the implementation of -raise > > I'm all for it. Just to clarify, the docs say: "The program then terminates, regardless of the actions taken by the *uncaught* exception handler." from: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Reference/Foundation/ObjC_classic/Classes/NSException.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20000061-CJHDDFII > > Cheers, > David Later, GJC Gregory John Casamento -- CEO/President Open Logic Corp. (A MD Corp.) ## Maintainer of Gorm (IB Equiv.) for GNUstep. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
