We only have our own custom libobjc due to problems compiling on
Windows. I've always wanted to get rid of it. As there are better
compiler tools on Windows now it may even be possible to do this soon.
On Jul 27, 2005, at 6:48 AM, Jeremy Bettis wrote:
Why is this my problem.
Look at
http://wwwmain.gnustep.org/resources/downloads.php?
site=http%3A%2F%2Fftpmain.gnustep.org%2Fpub%2Fgnustep%2F
Notice how it has listed libobjc as prereq on windows.
See the link to
http://ftpmain.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/libs/gnustep-objc-1.3.0.tar.gz
Notice how that is NOT GCC's libobjc.
See my patch to that code.
I don't really care what libobjc GCC has because I have to use
gnustep's.
Feel free to fix any of the steps that got us to this point, but don't
tell me that I am not using the right software when I followed the
published instructions.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Pinski"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeremy Bettis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Andrew Pinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [patch #4206] libobjc: Extend protocol hack to all gcc
versions
Gcc has a libobjc also, but the code I patched was from gnustep's CVS
server, not gcc's.
Let's take one step at a time.
The GNUstep's libobjc really should be removed now as it does not
contain
all the fixes which are in the GCC's CVS. And the libobjc in GCC is
upstream
so the bug should be submitted there first. This might turn out to
be a
front-end bug if you submit a bug to GCC's bug database.
-- Pinski
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
