On 8/2/05, Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2 Aug 2005, at 23:48, Yen-Ju Chen wrote: > > > > > Follow-up Comment #2, bug #14010 (project gnustep): > > > > It basically fixes the problem. > > I attach patches to make it work better (without warning). > > Thanks ... I committed a slightly simpler version (using existing > GNUSTEP preprocessor definition). > I also changed the call to [super dealloc] that you added to stop the > compiler complaining, making sure it was sent to a nil object and > could therefore do no harm. >
Thanx. It compiles well now. Yen-Ju > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnustep mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
