Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16218 (project gnustep):
My original thought was that it was a binary file and the default encoding
had changed but I could find no mention of any change in the docs. However I
came to think it was a bug because most of the objects in my program when
coded using the new format cannot be uncoded by the same library - the
archive I attached was the exception.
The error returned when trying to decode many objects is of the type
(nil) in subdataWithRange:, range { 393926, 32877 } extends beyond size
(424495)
or also
Unknown table size.
I wasnt very clear in the original submission but this is what I was
referring to when I wrote "more complicated objects ... cant be unarchived at
all". It could be due to a bug in my code somewhere but if so I don't
understand how archiving/unarchiving would work in one format but not
another.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=16218>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
