> Should they be closed as 'invalid' instead? I'm inclined to think it > would be nice to change code to avoid spurious compiler warnings as a > very low priority issue, but perhaps others feel different?
I would vote for leaving them in - ideally we'd like to get rid of compiler warnings, just so any which arent spurious dont get lost in the noise. So having a record is useful -bat. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnustep mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
