Follow-up Comment #14, bug #22278 (project gnustep):
By this logic, we shouldn't have NSToolbar or NSOutlineView since neither of
them were present in OpenStep. You only saw outline view in IB under OpenStep
because it was part of the NeXT private framework.
What we're really talking about is whether a theme which targets a given
environment should try to provide all widgets that are provided by GNUstep in
that environment, even when that environment may not have that given widget or
if the widget should be left out all together or replaced by something that is
in the target environment.
I believe that we should provide all widgets that GNUstep is capable of in
all themes. That is to say, when a widget we have in GNUstep is not
something that was done by NeXT, then we should, in the NeXT theme, have
something which is it's "equivalent" which is done in the spirit of that
theme.
GJC
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?22278>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
