Follow-up Comment #14, bug #22565 (project gnustep):
Hi David,
I must be missing something. For educational purposes, can you clue me in on
the specific simple cases that you're referring to?
Also wondering about your recent change to computeCountForKey: and the
check-in comment right before that one, which says "This is not WO45
compatible". Can you clarify specifically what is not WO45 compatible? I'm
also not clear on the @count handling--I thought @count ignored the string
following the operator in both EOF and Cocoa.
Thanks,
Tim
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?22565>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
