Follow-up Comment #17, bug #24785 (project gnustep):
In fact, I'm going with Richard here and am very skeptical that the change in
r27195 does fix anything at all. I've looked at the assembler output of
NSApplication.m for x86 and ppc with three different compiler versions and the
only difference for all of them is one additional instruction that sets the
higher order 24 bits of the result register (r3 on ppc, eax on x86) to zero
after the change. Given the legitimate values of type BOOL (0,1) and
NSApplicationTerminateReply (0,1,2) this does not make any difference at all.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?24785>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
