Follow-up Comment #4, bug #27008 (project gnustep):
Thank you for adding the comments, it's actually much clearer now why that
code is there. It turns out that the code in gnustep-base wasn't responsible
for my problem after all. The enumerator was initialized correctly, but the
subsequent code (initially written for 32bit archs) wasn't entirely 64bit
safe, so the variables began trampling over each other. I guess that the map
field was simply overwritten, causing the wrong code path to be selected.
I'm sorry for the confusion, but thank you nonetheless for the
clarification!
Cheers,
Niels
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?27008>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep
