On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 22:55 +0200, al3xu5 / dotcommon wrote: > citing from their guidelines: > "we do not want to list add-ons that are only helpers for "Software as a > Service." That means the add-on sends your data to someone else's > server, which does a computation on your data and sends you back the > results. If you see an add-on in this list which appears to be just a > front-end for Software as a Service, please report it." > > do not you think such a guideline should be appropriate (ad then > adopted) also for the icecat free software extension list?
What about "Software as a Service" using GNU AGPL software? I don't know of any examples off of the top of my head. But the choice to use a server owned and operated by someone else to run software that is available under the GNU AGPL doesn't seem to be a problem to me. Any thoughts? Eric... -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
