On Wednesday 01 December 2010 17:01:56 Sam Geeraerts wrote: > Leo Rockway wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 December 2010 15:55:35 Sam Geeraerts wrote: > >> Not so for Colorzilla. I wonder how reliable that information is. I hope > >> it's not extracted from the xpi by some automatic process. > > > > I really don't know how this works, but I was surprised to see it. It would be > > very wrong if the information provided turned out not to be true and people > > download an addon thinking it's free when it's not. > > Actually, I've been seeing it for quite a while now. I just remembered > that something about that has been discussed on this list before, and > indeed, I found my own (overly optimistic) email [1]. I can no longer > find anything about a review process. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00366.html
Oh, sorry, I subscribed to the list exactly a month later. I guess Mozilla people have been contacted about a review process already and they aren't cooperating? -- RMS Rose GNU/Linux-libre http://rmsgnulinux.org #rmsgnulinux @ irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
