On Wednesday 01 December 2010 17:01:56 Sam Geeraerts wrote:
> Leo Rockway wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 December 2010 15:55:35 Sam Geeraerts wrote:
> >> Not so for Colorzilla. I wonder how reliable that information is. I hope 
> >> it's not extracted from the xpi by some automatic process.
> > 
> > I really don't know how this works, but I was surprised to see it. It 
would be 
> > very wrong if the information provided turned out not to be true and 
people 
> > download an addon thinking it's free when it's not.
> 
> Actually, I've been seeing it for quite a while now. I just remembered 
> that something about that has been discussed on this list before, and 
> indeed, I found my own (overly optimistic) email [1]. I can no longer 
> find anything about a review process.
> 
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00366.html

Oh, sorry, I subscribed to the list exactly a month later.

I guess Mozilla people have been contacted about a review process already and 
they aren't cooperating?

-- 
RMS Rose GNU/Linux-libre
http://rmsgnulinux.org
#rmsgnulinux @ irc.freenode.net

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

Reply via email to