Дмитрий Габинский <[email protected]> writes: > 18 августа 2011 г. 22:38 пользователь Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]> >> >> Thanks to have reported it! > > You’re welcome. But kidding aside, how do you think you can attract > more volunteers without ready compiled binaries? With them, you can > suggest users IceCat as an option to have Firefox functionality > without installing the latter, thus, without the need to cope with > dependencies etc. And with better privacy as well. Without binaries, > you can only attract a handful of geeks willing to wait half a day > while it compiles.
There are binaries for different distros, don't they work better than static binaries? Why don't you use them? Don't keep everything centralized make new contributions easier, I think. > P. S. I will raise the issue of compiled binaries again and again > until I get banned from this list. Or until you deliver them :-) unless you advertise magic blue pills or hair grow solutions, nobody is going to ban you :-) Cheers, Giuseppe -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
