I've never used the plugin. What is the name of the plugin? Is it available on AMO?
Thanks, Narcis Garcia <[email protected]> writes: > I mentioned that plugin because I think that integrated feature is not > necessary if the plugins give the option. > > > El 06/03/14 18:03, Jonas Wielicki ha escrit: >> On 06.03.2014 17:59, Narcis Garcia wrote: >>> I remember in the past that there was a plugin for Mozilla Firefox to do >>> this syncing of user's profile. I think that Mozilla has only integrated >>> that idea. >> >> This is true insofar as the current Sync feature is based on that plugin >> -- however, that awful new Sync feature is not. >> >> regards, >> Jonas Wielicki >> >>> >>> >>> El 06/03/14 15:24, Figue ha escrit: >>>> I'm very happy with Firefox Sync and the possibility to work with all my >>>> info replicated between machines. Very useful. >>>> If I may say, please, don't remove it. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Loic J. Duros <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> One thing that is sure is that you won't see the marketing >>>> information. I'm not yet sure at this point what we'll do for the >>>> Firefox Sync feature. Someone would have to test a custom server and >>>> see >>>> if it is still working. Keeping the old sync functionality alive sounds >>>> like a headache. >>>> >>>> I for one don't consider Firefox Sync to be a very important feature >>>> for >>>> my browsing experience. The question is, is it to some IceCat users? >>>> Maybe someone here can share her/his experience with Sync. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Loic >>>> >>>> Jonas Wielicki <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> writes: >>>> >>>> > Dear Icecat team, >>>> > >>>> > I wonder what your plans are regarding the new sync feature of >>>> mozilla >>>> > firefox, which will have impact from firefox 29 onwards (discussion >>>> is >>>> > e.g. here[1]). >>>> > >>>> > I feel that this “feature” severely limits the freedom of the >>>> user; One >>>> > seems to be forced to mozillas services, they even state that they >>>> have >>>> > not much intention to allow custom servers: >>>> > >>>> >> * In general, Custom Server support for FxA Sync in Fx29 be >>>> somewhere >>>> >> between a "non-goal" and "best effort" >>>> >> * If you're already connected to Sync, then in Fx29, your set up >>>> >> should continue to work. >>>> >> * Otherwise, it is subject to other above restrictions for Legacy >>>> >> Sync users. >>>> >> * Custom servers should in theory be possible with FxA Sync, but >>>> with >>>> >> a different architecture (Token server + Sync 1.5). >>>> > (from [2]) >>>> > >>>> > Do you intend to take that feature as is, disable sync completely or >>>> > will you keep the old sync functionality alive? >>>> > >>>> > regards, >>>> > Jonas Wielicki >>>> > >>>> > [1]: https://github.com/posativ/weave-minimal/issues/26 >>>> > [2]: >>>> > >>>> >>>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/User_Services/Sync/Transition_To_FxA_Sync#Custom_Servers >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Joan Figueras >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >>> >> >> >> -- >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >> > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
