I don't think there is any more security by signing stuff that is built-in, it's not like were downloading an unsigned browser or anything.
On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 22:47 +0200, David Englund/Hedlund wrote: > The default add-ons in Abrowser is not signed. Can you fix that Ruben? > > > Also, is it ok to discuss Abrowser in this mailing list? > > > I mean it has the same code base as IceCat. The difference is that > Abrowser is targeted at the non-ESR version of Firefox and specifically > packaged for Trisquel. > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
