One would have to analyze the code, and save a checksum to watch that code at each DDG change.
My notice was to defend the use of AGPL and community driven search websites. El 19/08/15 a les 23:27, Respiranto ha escrit: > Since the code is executed on the users computer, I don't see why this > should be a privacy abuse. > Are visited pages ranked higher than others? This would indeed mean that > private data is sent to the remote server. > I did not notice an altered relevance after having visited a page for > the first time. > > Of course one would have to skim through the code to make ultimately > sure, that it does not send private data back to its server. > > > On 2015-08-19, 21:34, Narcis Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: >> Currently DuckDuckGo returns private information in the results. >> When user performs a search, results include a small mark when are >> aleady visited in the past. This means DDG JavaScript accesses to web >> browser history. >> I've tried this with M.Firefox. >> >> Will need Icecat be fighting against DDG privacy abuses? >> >> >> -- >> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
