Requests like this one can be seen as a problem with bundling a general-purpose ad-blocker with icecat: users will now be asking gnuzilla to fix whatever is broken in there, since upstream fixes may or may not trickle down to them.
In this particular case, however, I have to wonder at the reasoning behind insisting on using icecat while browsing spotify. Isn't that a drm shop? I am afraid to enable javascript there. Max, by making that website work in icecat you demolish whatever advantage you gained over using the stock firefox. What you are doing is akin to installing Trisquel, and then replacing the kernel with a blobby one (because your hardware needs blobs), and finally installing a steam client with a bunch of non-free games. I don't recommend it, but would it not be easier to just use something like Ubuntu or whoever is already in bed with that sleaze? On 12/10/2015 04:01 PM, Max Hype wrote: > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org/filters/third-party.txt > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org/filters/blacklist.txt > > When using the filters above it will break play.spotify.com > <http://play.spotify.com> website, can you please fix it? > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
