I don't support..
..using Torbrowser as a base, because it is its own thing now. Since
torbrowser upstreams many of its patches, then it's just as good to
take stuff from upstream, as I see the requirement for a
general-purpose browser that's better, of less bloat, and has slightly
better security than vanilla firefox (aka upstream).

Because if IceCat were advertised as "This is just like Torbrowser",
or "Based on Torbrowser code", then this would give privacy-minded,
but mostly uninformed people a false sense of security.

That us why Torbrowser is separate, and should stay as such.

-M.

2016-11-15 9:05 GMT+02:00, David Hedlund <pub...@beloved.name>:
> Vote for ng0's proposal on https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49604
>
> --
> http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
>

--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org

Reply via email to