On 2016-12-21 18:34, Sedov Andrey wrote:
I'm not arguing that a high rating is more donations. More donations
is the best development software. But the betrayal of the idea Adblock
= this betrayal.
I said that uBlock Origin refuse to take donations. The author, Raymond
Hill, is against it, thus nobody can sue him as they tried with the
Adblock Plus company Eyeo.
I think that GNU's fair. Adblock is not fair. I think people are
coasting (old information) make a choice Adblock. But over time more
people will use uBlock Origin and less use of Adblock. And ratings for
AMO Adblock will decrease uBlock Origin will improve (heh... I know
I'm naive and idealist:) )So I think that the way IceCat SpyBlock is
the way with uBlock Origin, but not the path with the traitor Adblock.
If you have a Savannah account, then please put your vote on
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49606 (click on "Votes" at the bottom of
the page).
21.12.2016 23:55, David Hedlund пишет:
The AMO popularity rank is a key factor in making a good decision.
uBlock Origin refuse to take donations so this cannot be profitable
for the devs.
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
