Charles Levert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about something like > > configure --with-wrapper-scripts > > ? > Is there some precedent for such a configure > option (and its name) in another GNU software?
Not as far as I know, no. >> (main): Do not let behavior depend on the name of the program; >> as required by the GNU coding standards. > > Why are you also removing the MS-DOS code to > strip C: off of program_name? Because the behavior no longer depends on the program name, so it's OK to leave the program name as-is. The usual tradition in GNU code (e.g., coreutils) is a simple "program_name = argv[0];".
