Joe Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I now can see what the difference between your environment and mine > must be. I'm also using this environment variable setting: > > LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 > > When I change this (just for the “grep” process) to
On some systems, the locale name is spelled slightly differently: [get the proper spelling from the output of "locale -a"] RHEL5 has the bug [rpm -q grep -> grep-2.5.1-52.2]: $ printf '\0x' | LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 grep '[^x]x' [Exit 1] Debian unstable seems not to have a problem: $ printf '\0x' | LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 grep '[^x]x' Binary file (standard input) matches I've Cc'd [email protected], since that's the preferred bug-reporting address. > I suppose the problem might be in glibc? Or perhaps there is a bug in > the locale data files? > > (By the way, if any character in the input is being discarded for some > reason (e.g., invalid UTF-8 format), can I please ask that there > should be an error message generated by grep for this? Otherwise > problems will be too difficult to track down.) > > By the way, I am using Ubuntu 6.06 LTS (“Dapper Drake”) with all I would consider upgrading. >> [resending just to you, because your mail server blocked my first reply >> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host izanami.macs.hw.ac.uk[137.195.13.6] said: 550 >> 82.230.74.64 is listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.ja.net (in reply to RCPT >> TO >> command) >> ] > > Sorry about that! I don't know why that RBL lists that IP address > (mx.meyering.net). I'm glad I got your second e-mail. I suggest you tell the folks who administer that mail server that they are blocking non-spam mail from a static IP address that has been completely spam-free (and not an open relay, etc.) for more than three years. In this case, I took the trouble to route mail for your domain through a different outbound server, but most correspondents getting such a bounce would not do that.
