Andreas Schwab wrote:
Richard Neill writes:
Thanks for your email. Sadly, my contrived example is oversimplified, such
that the sub-section is in the nth field, where n is known in advance -
but that isn't necessarily true.
Not a problem, awk can handle that quite well.
An example of 'blah | grep -e foo -e bar | grep -E "[0-9]"' (which was
approximately the original point) in awk would be nice...
--
Matthew
> A: Yes.
>> Q: Are you sure?
>>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
