On 09/15/2011 01:29 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>  d->mb_cur_max = MBS_SUPPORT ? MB_CUR_MAX : 1
That's tempting, but not needed.
MB_CUR_MAX is already defined appropriately, so what's there is fine:

        d->mb_cur_max = MB_CUR_MAX;


Yes, I'm suggesting to drop the "appropriate definition" (patch 22) for now. It was too clever for me to grasp it, so I need separate convincing. :)

Paolo

Reply via email to