On 10/10/2011 05:21 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> The reason is that then MB_CUR_MAX would be inconsistent with the > behavior of mbrlen and similar functions.Surely it's OK if MB_CUR_MAX is larger than it strictly needs to be.
Exactly my point, mbrlen could return a value > 1, while MB_CUR_MAX could have been #undef'ed and redefined to 1.
Paolo
