Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On Monday 21 November 2011, Jim Meyering wrote: >> >> +# Given compare_dev_null_'s preprocessing, for 0 or 2, defer to compare_. >> > This comments should be adjusted as well, I think.
Done. Thanks.
>> +# Otherwise, differences have already been printed, so return 1.
>> +compare ()
>> +{
>> + compare_dev_null_ "$@"
>> + case $? in
>> + 0|1) return $?;;
