[email protected] wrote: > The definition of is_valid_unibyte_character needs to match what's > currently in HEAD...
Good point. Paolo, would you please rebase the series and repost? Sorry it's taken so long to review.
[email protected] wrote: > The definition of is_valid_unibyte_character needs to match what's > currently in HEAD...
Good point. Paolo, would you please rebase the series and repost? Sorry it's taken so long to review.