On 01/15/2013 11:17 AM, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I just got the below bug report. Apparently it has to do with the
> fact that xalloc.h includes <stddef.h>.
> 
> Any objection to changing the order of includes as suggested?  Or
> how about moving the include of <stddef.h> into dfa.c itself?

I'd rather see a patch that makes dfa.h work standalone - that is, add
an #include <stddef.h> into dfa.h, without touching dfa.c at all.  These
days, it is considered poor practice to write a header that cannot be
used without first including some other header.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to