On Aug 26 21:58, Jim Meyering wrote: > I guess it is a different point of view. Maybe I'm just too > forward-thinking? :-) > I.e., if the remaining cygwin-specific bug is fixed soon, there will > be little reason for separate tests. > Are you planning to work on the cygwin/regexp bug?
Not in the next couple of weeks. I'll be abroad for a while. Maybe in October or November. I put it on my TODO list. The biggest problem is that I know the BSD regex code pretty well, but the gnulib regex code is very different. I already had a look two weeks ago, but I have not found the right place to mount surrogate pairs into it :( Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat
pgp2no6M01nuH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
