On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Eric Blake <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/21/2014 10:34 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Norihiro Tanaka <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Thanks for the review and push. >>> >>> I also submit a test case for this bug. It fails in grep-2.18.146-ebf3, >>> and succeeds in current master. >> >> Thanks again. >> However, that new test made it so "make syntax-check" would fail. >> I've suppressed that new failure via the attached: > > It's also possible to rewrite the line: > > grep -f in 'in' >out || fail=1 > > so as to avoid needing the suppression (I'm not sure which is prettier).
Thanks for the suggestion. Since this is a false-positive after all, I prefer to keep the work-around out of the primary source file, even if that means exempting this entire file from that one syntax-check. It is unlikely to matter.
